Discussion about this post

User's avatar
ZeroDayDigest's avatar

Great analysis. Shadow AI and agentic identity risks echo loudly in ad ecosystems, where rogue agents scrape campaigns, spiking bot traffic 30-50% via flawed code (that 24% vuln stat nails it).

On the ad fraud front, VibeSec is extending to programmatic defenses, AI creatives now slip LPCI-like injections past runtime checks, fueling persistent loops in CTV/gaming. Decoupled SOC pipelines shine here, slashing false positives 60% by prioritizing high-signal telemetry for NHI exfil hunts.

Thrilled by the cyber resilience pivot, prevention's outdated. Keep leading these vital convos; NYC dinner vibes have me hooked if spots open!

Neural Foundry's avatar

This hits the confidence gap perfectly. What really stands out is that even with $96B in M&A and 85% of orgs increasing spend, over half of practitioners still feel underfunded against AI threats—that's not a budget problem, that's an architectural one. The shift from 'prevernt everything' to cyber resilience makes sense when you realize most teams are drowning in 25+ fragmented tools. I saw this firsthand at a midsize company where adding another point solution actually made their SOC slower becuase nobody could connect the alerts. The UADP thesis you outline basically admits the vendor ecosystem created its own problem through overfragmentation.

No posts

Ready for more?